Original Article
Are Crops Still Profitable in Cauvery River Basin of Karnataka?
Year: 2018 | Month: December | Volume 63 | Issue 4
1.Bohle, H. 2004. Vom Wasserkonflikt zur Wasserkrise – Der Niedergang eines südindischen Deltas. Geographische Rundschau, 56(12): 40-45.
View at Google Scholar2.Harish, M.H. 2006. An economic appraisal of land use dynamics in Mandya district. M.Sc. (Agri.) Thesis, Univ. Agric. Sci., Dharwad (India).
View at Google Scholar3.Mohan, L. 2005. Economic efficiency of cropping pattern under different sources of irrigation. M.Sc. (Agri.) Thesis, Univ. Agric. Sci., Dharwad (India).
View at Google Scholar4.Narayanamoorthy, A. 2013. Profitability in crops cultivation in India: some evidence from cost of cultivation survey data. Indian J. Agri. Econ., 68(1): 104-120
View at Google Scholar5.Narendra, P.N. 2009. Institution that cannot manage change: A Gandhian perspective on the Cauvery dispute in South India, Water Alternatives, 2(3): 315-327.
View at Google Scholar6.Ningareddy, P. 2005. A study on knowledge, extent of participation and benefits derived by participant farmers of the watershed development programme. M.Sc. (Agri.) Thesis, Univ. Agric. Sci., Dharwad (India
View at Google Scholar7.Pavankumar, B.G. 2011. Economics of Bt. Cotton cultivation - a comparative analysis across different farm sizes in northern transitional zone, Karnataka. M.Sc. (Agri) Thesis, Univ. Agric. Sci., Dharwad (India).
View at Google Scholar8.Pradeep, 2006. An economic analysis of woolly aphid infestation on sugarcane in Mandya district of Karnataka. M.Sc. (Agri.) Thesis, Univ. Agric. Sci., Dharwad (India).
View at Google Scholar9.Prasad, R. 2007. National dialogue to review and evolve parameters for interstate transboundary water sharing in India. National Institute of Advanced Studies (NIAS), pp. 2-5
View at Google Scholar10.Suresh, A. and Keshav Reddy, T.R. 2006. Resource use efficiency of paddy cultivation in peechi command area of Thrissur district of Kerala: An economic analysis. Agric. Econ. Res. Rev., 19(1-6): 159-171.
View at Google Scholar